← Controls / SA

SA-10 Developer Configuration Management

System and Services Acquisition

Moderate High

Description

Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to: a. Perform configuration management during system, component, or service [Selection (one or more): design; development; implementation; operation; disposal]; b. Document, manage, and control the integrity of changes to [Assignment: organization-defined configuration items under configuration management]; c. Implement only organization-approved changes to the system, component, or service; d. Document approved changes to the system, component, or service and the potential security and privacy impacts of such changes; and e. Track security flaws and flaw resolution within the system, component, or service and report findings to [Assignment: organization-defined personnel].

Supplemental Guidance

Organizations consider the quality and completeness of configuration management activities conducted by developers as direct evidence of applying effective security controls. Controls include protecting the master copies of material used to generate security-relevant portions of the system hardware, software, and firmware from unauthorized modification or destruction. Maintaining the integrity of changes to the system, system component, or system service requires strict configuration control throughout the system development life cycle to track authorized changes and prevent unauthorized changes. The configuration items that are placed under configuration management include the formal model; the functional, high-level, and low-level design specifications; other design data; implementation documentation; source code and hardware schematics; the current running version of the object code; tools for comparing new versions of security-relevant hardware descriptions and source code with previous versions; and test fixtures and documentation. Depending on the mission and business needs of organizations and the nature of the contractual relationships in place, developers may provide configuration management support during the operations and maintenance stage of the system development life cycle.

Changes from Rev 4

Adds 'disposal' to parameter text selections Adds 'privacy' to control text

Enhancements (7)

What NIST adds to this control. Select one to read its statement.

SA-10(01) Software and Firmware Integrity Verification

Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to enable integrity verification of software and firmware components.

SA-10(02) Alternative Configuration Management Processes

Provide an alternate configuration management process using organizational personnel in the absence of a dedicated developer configuration management team.

SA-10(03) Hardware Integrity Verification

Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to enable integrity verification of hardware components.

SA-10(04) Trusted Generation

Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to employ tools for comparing newly generated versions of security-relevant hardware descriptions, source code, and object code with previous versions.

SA-10(05) Mapping Integrity for Version Control

Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to maintain the integrity of the mapping between the master build data describing the current version of security-relevant hardware, software, and firmware and the on-site master copy of the data for the current version.

SA-10(06) Trusted Distribution

Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to execute procedures for ensuring that security-relevant hardware, software, and firmware updates distributed to the organization are exactly as specified by the master copies.

SA-10(07) Security and Privacy Representatives

Require [Assignment: organization-defined security and privacy representatives] to be included in the [Assignment: organization-defined configuration change management and control process].

MITRE ATT&CK Techniques (27)

ATT&CK v16.1

Techniques mitigated by this control, mapped via CTID.

Initial Access 6 Execution 2 Persistence 14 Privilege Escalation 5 Defense Evasion 17 Lateral Movement 1 Collection 1 Impact 1

Compliance Mappings

ISO 27001:2022

6.3A.8.4A.8.9A.8.25A.8.28A.8.30A.8.32

ISO 27002:2022

8.48.258.308.32

COBIT 2019

BAI03BAI06

CIS Controls v8

CIS 2.6CIS 16CIS 16.4

NIST CSF 2.0

ID.RA-09PR.PS-06

PCI DSS v4.0.1

6.26.5

ISO 42001:2023

A.6.1.3A.6.2.3

NIS2 Directive

Art. 21(2)(e)

PRA Operational Resilience

SS1/21-11.1

MAS TRM

6

ANSSI

Hygiene.34Hygiene.36SecNumCloud.15.4

FINMA Circular 2023/1

IV.A(36)IV.A(37)IV.A(38)IV.A(39)

OSFI B-13

B-13.2.3B-13.3.2

EU GDPR

Art.25(1)Art.32(1)(d)

EU DORA

Art.8(5)Art.9(4)(e)

BIO2

8.48.258.308.32

RBI CSF

Annex1.6ITGRCA.13

FISC Security Guidelines

FISC.O3FISC.O10FISC.T6

HKMA TM-E-1

TME1.3.2TME1.4.3

MLPS 2.0

8.1.9.5

DNB Good Practice

DNB.10.1DNB.10.5

EU CRA

CRA.I.1CRA.I.2f

SAMA CSF

3.2

NCA ECC

1-62-3

UAE IA

T10

CBB TM

TM-7

Qatar NIA

SD

CBUAE

CR-6

CBE CSF

CTO-4CTO-12

SA JS2

JS2-SA

BoG CISD

CISD-SDLC

BoM CTRM

3.63.11

IOSCO Cyber Resilience

PROT-6

BCBS 239

Principle 3

FFIEC IS

II.C.10II.C.17

EBA ICT Guidelines

3.6.23.6.3

SEBI CSCRF

PR.ASPR.IP

BOT Cyber Resilience

Ch2.5

CMMC 2.0

CM

PCI PTS v6

BF

FIPS 140-3

FIPS 140-3 §7.5FIPS 140-3 §7.11

Common Criteria

CC Part 3 — SAR

ISAE 3402

Clause 4

Solvency II

EIOPA-ICT-4.11

Lloyd's Minimum Standards

MS8.4

PRA SS1/23

P3.1P3.3P3.4

FCA SYSC 13

SYSC 13.7.1SYSC 13.7.4

HITRUST CSF v11

09.a10.d

FDA 21 CFR Part 11

§11.10(a)

FDA Cybersecurity Guidance

524B-1PU-1SA-3SBOM-1SBOM-2

ISO 27799

14.2

Basel SCO60

SCO60.52

BSSC Standards

NOS-02TIS-08

ISO 17799 (legacy)

12.5.112.5.2

COBIT 4.1 (legacy)

None.